CO129-160 - Public Offices - 1872 — Page 576

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed
Series Prev Next

574

You will see that as to the first question Mr Nothing doubted whether the Avn was entitled to claim exemption under the Postal Convention, and this point was therefore referred to the Law Officers of the Crown, who requested to advise were upon the two following questions.

1. Whether a French vessel which engaged in the French Government Postal Service and called in either occasionally or regularly in the course of her voyage at some British port, was exempt under the terms of the Postal Convention from the liability, which attached to all other vessels, for any damage which she might have done in collision with any other vessel.

2. Whether if such a vessel was not within the terms of the Convention, but was chartered or subsidized...

Edit History

2026-05-20 22:35:59 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
574 You will see that as to the first question Mr Nothing doubted whether the Avn was entitled to claim exemption under the Postal Convention, and this point was therefore referred to the Law Officers of the Crown, who requested to advise were upon the two following questions. 1. Whether a French vessel which engaged in the French Government Postal Service and called in either occasionally or regularly in the course of her voyage at some British port, was exempt under the terms of the Postal Convention from the liability, which attached to all other vessels, for any damage which she might have done in collision with any other vessel. 2. Whether if such a vessel was not within the terms of the Convention, but was chartered or subsidized...
Baseline (Original)
574 You will see. that as to the first question Mr Nothing doubted whether the Avn was entitled to claim exemption under the Postat Convention, and this point was therefore referred to the Law Officers of the Crown, who requested to advise were upon the two following questions. 1. Whether a French ressel which engaged in the French Jovernment Portat Service Service 人 and called in either occasionally or regularly in the course of her at some voyage. British port, was exempt. under the terms of. the Postal Convention from the liability, which attached to all other vessels, for any damage which she might have. done in collision with any other vessel, 2. Whether if such a vessel wa not within the terms of the Convention, but was charlenest or subsidized
2026-05-20 22:35:59 · Baseline
View content

574

You will see.

that as to the first question Mr Nothing

doubted whether the

Avn was entitled to

claim exemption under the Postat Convention, and this point was

therefore referred to

the Law Officers of

the Crown, who

requested to advise

were

upon the two following

questions.

1. Whether a French

ressel which

engaged

in the French

Jovernment Portat

Service

Service

人

and called in either

occasionally or regularly

in the course of her

at some

voyage. British port,

was exempt.

under the terms of. the Postal Convention

from the liability, which

attached to all other

vessels, for any damage

which she

might have.

done in collision with

any

other vessel,

2. Whether if

such a vessel wa

not within the terms

of

the Convention, but

was charlenest

or

subsidized

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.